Search Articles & Publications

Showing 12 articles found for "Defendant"
Jurnal Legislasi dan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025)

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DEBTORS ON THE GUARANTEE OF MOTOR VEHICLE OWNERSHIP BOOK (BPKB)IN CREDIT LOANS(Analysis of the Decision in Case Number 70/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn)

Kincia
Abstract: The legal position between the debtor and the debtor in the bond agreement, where the borrower has the right to return proof of ownership of the collateral after the loan payment, while the borrower has the right to a higher… gher bond amount, and the billing period in accordance with the guarantor who is entitled to payment plus principal (interest) with the borrower's monthly installments including compensation in the event of late payment. Settlement of disputes related to credit agreements, where the person concerned can arbitrate the agreement in question. Legal observations made by the judge in the decision of Case No. 70 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PN.Mdn, where the judge is of the opinion that the plaintiff has won legally there is no action taken by the Defendant on behalf of Mas Arif Fauzan and verstek. The issuance of this decision is binding on both parties because it has permanent legal force ( incracht ) and has become a new law for the parties. The judge made the decision based on previous legal opinions and the judge's belief that presenting a legitimate and persuasive action is a breach of contract
Global Research Analysis Decision Case Number
34 views
Jurnal Legislasi dan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025)

LEGAL ACTION AGAINST WITHDRAWALWAKAF PROPERTY(Decision Study No. 22/Pdt.G/2017/MS-Aceh)

Jiko
Abstract: Withdrawal of Waqf Assets based on Decision No. 22/Pdt.G/2017/MS-Aceh because the objects which are waqf assets belonging to the Bireueen Islamic Education Society have been misused by the Bireueen Ministry of Religious… Affairs in a dysfunctional manner, namely the waqf objects are recorded as Public Property. In order for the irregularity of the waqf assets to be in accordance with the waqf pledge made, the owner of the waqf rights takes over the waqf assets. The validity of Nazir as the owner of the waqf rights in the event of misappropriation of waqf assets based on Resolution no. 22/Pdt.G/2017/MS-Aceh is reviewed from the provisions of Article 42 of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf which explains: "It is the duty of nazhir to manage and dispose of waqf assets for their intended use, according to their function and designation." So that the waqf assets that were originally borrowed by the owner of the waqf rights can be disposed of if there is misuse of waqf assets. The Judge's reason for permitting the takeover of misused waqf assets in Decision no. 22/Pdt.G/2017/MS-Aceh, based on the findings of the facts by the Judge, is of the opinion that legally there is no legal justification for the Defendant/Applicant to hold objects that are unlawfully and unlawfully owned and managed as YPI Bireuen's claim property.
Global Research Decision Study Aceh
35 views