Abstract:The rapid expansion of the digital economy in Indonesia has significantly transformed business practices and, consequently, the landscape of business dispute resolution. This study presents a critical comparative analysis…
s of arbitration—particularly online arbitration—and conventional court litigation in resolving business disputes in post-digitalization Indonesia. The research focuses on two principal aspects: legal certainty and time efficiency. Using normative juridical analysis supported by relevant legal theories, including Progressive Legal Theory, Development Legal Theory, and Legal Convergence Theory, this study examines the adaptability of dispute resolution mechanisms within the framework of Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and related regulations governing electronic court administration. The findings indicate that arbitration, especially through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), offers greater procedural flexibility, shorter resolution time, and cost efficiency compared to conventional litigation, which remains burdened by rigid procedural stages, administrative complexity, and case backlogs. Digitalization has further enhanced arbitration efficiency by enabling electronic submission of documents, virtual hearings, and digital evidence examination. However, challenges persist, including technological infrastructure limitations, data security concerns, and the need for regulatory harmonization to ensure enforceability and equal legal legitimacy with court decisions. This study concludes that while digital arbitration demonstrates superior time efficiency and practical advantages, regulatory reform and institutional strengthening are essential to guarantee optimal legal certainty in Indonesia’s evolving digital business environment.
Abstract:This research explores dispute resolution methods in the field of Sharia economics through the arbitration mechanism. With the rapid growth of Sharia-based financial industries, the need for effective dispute resolution…
in accordance with Sharia economic principles becomes increasingly pressing. Arbitration is considered a relevant alternative compatible with Islamic law in handling Sharia economic conflicts. This study will trace the Islamic legal principles applicable in arbitration and analyze the success and challenges of Sharia economic dispute resolution through the arbitration process. Additionally, the research will review the role of arbitration institutions and regulations supporting Sharia dispute resolution. Thus, this study provides in-depth insights into the potential of arbitration as an effective means of resolving Sharia economic disputes and its contribution to the global development of Sharia-based financial systems.
Abstract:Sengketa Laut China Selatan menimbulkan persoalan hukum internasional akibat klaim sepihak nine dash line oleh Tiongkok yang tumpang tindih dengan rezim hukum laut internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis…
is kedudukan hukum klaim nine dash line ditinjau berdasarkan ketentuan United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 serta mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa Laut China Selatan melalui hukum internasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, khususnya terhadap UNCLOS 1982 dan Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tahun 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa klaim nine dash line tidak memiliki dasar hukum dan bertentangan dengan ketentuan UNCLOS 1982, serta bahwa mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang diatur dalam UNCLOS telah tersedia secara normatif namun menghadapi keterbatasan dalam penerapannya akibat ketergantungan pada kepatuhan negara.
Abstract:Disputes resolution in the field of Islamic banking are actually arranged in Article 55, paragraph (1), (2), and (3) of the Law on Islamic Banking. The Problem appear when choice of legal forum (choice of forum) for finish…
sh dispute banking agreed for choose one of the legal forums in settlement dispute when the parties No want to finish it through religious courts and their contracts No stated in a way clear the choice of legal forum selected. This is where the need for certainty of law in settling the dispute in question arises, and how the Constitutional Court's decision for certainty of law can be realized in Islamic banking disputes. The research method used is descriptive normative. Research results explain that the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93/PUU/X/2012 confirms certainty of law by deleting dualism of authority justice, making the Religious Court as an institution the sole authority to finish Islamic banking through track litigation. Thus, it can be concluded that this decision cancels the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of the Sharia Banking Law, eliminates forum selection to the District Court; however, it still allows non-litigation settlement, such as Sharia arbitration. The settlement process of disputes in Islamic banking, as arranged in Article 55 paragraph (1), (2), and (3) of the Sharia Banking Law, has given duties and authorities to courts in the neighborhood religious courts.
Abstract:Sharia insurance in Indonesia is growing, because along with the increasingly complex disputes between parties, which cannot be avoided between Islamic insurance companies and policyholders, this is even though both of them…
hem help and protect each other. The problem is regarding the legal basis for sharia insurance dispute resolution which is still scattered in several laws and regulations. This has become a discourse and issue of legal norms for sharia arbitration as an option for sharia insurance dispute resolution, and so far the resolution of sharia insurance disputes through sharia arbitration is regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016. The research method used is descriptive normative. The research method used is descriptive normative by analyzing regulations laws governing sharia dispute resolution. The results of this study explain that state policy in managing sharia insurance disputes is still a discourse, so that constitutional authority still uses Article 58 of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Therefore, it is necessary to amend Law No. 30 of 1999, specifically regarding the article regarding the District Court, which must be supplemented by the Religious Courts and procedures for resolving disputes through sharia arbitration.