Abstract:Justice collaborators, or "crown witnesses," have become essential in modern criminal justice systems, particularly in dismantling organized crime and uncovering complex murder cases. This study explores the legal protections…
tions afforded to justice collaborators in Indonesia through a doctrinal analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1704 K/PID.SUS/2022, commonly known as the Richard Eliezer verdict. The objective is to critically examine the adequacy and application of legal safeguards provided to individuals who cooperate with law enforcement while implicated in serious crimes. Employing normative legal research methods and a statutory and case approach, the paper reveals discrepancies in the implementation of protections for justice collaborators. While the Indonesian Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) offers procedural protections, this analysis identifies significant gaps in enforcement, judicial interpretation, and institutional coordination. The findings underscore a need for stronger legislative frameworks and consistent judicial standards to uphold the rights and safety of justice collaborators. The implications extend to criminal law reform and the balancing of retributive justice with restorative mechanisms. This study contributes to the legal discourse on human rights protections in criminal procedure, particularly concerning vulnerable individuals assisting the justice system under duress or threat.
Abstract:Freight forwarding agreements in Indonesia frequently contain exoneration clauses that exempt logistics providers from liability for loss or damage, raising serious concerns regarding consumer protection. While such clauses…
ses are designed to manage contractual risk, they often conflict with the principles enshrined in Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), particularly those ensuring fairness, good faith, and legal accountability. This study investigates the legality and ethical implications of exoneration clauses within standard-form freight forwarding contracts used by companies such as JNE, TIKI, and SiCepat. Employing a doctrinal legal research methodology, the study integrates statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches to analyze primary legislation, judicial decisions, and relevant legal doctrines. It critically evaluates the use of these clauses in light of consumer rights, contract theory, and the economic impact on service quality. Findings reveal that exoneration clauses not only contravene the UUPK but also create systemic contractual imbalances due to the lack of negotiation opportunities and transparency. The study proposes a normative legal framework for reform, including clause classification, interactive consent mechanisms, and regulatory enforcement to ensure contractual fairness. This research contributes to both legal scholarship and policy development by highlighting the urgent need for doctrinal clarity and regulatory oversight in Indonesia's logistics sector.
Abstract:The Indonesian capital market plays a pivotal role in mobilising long-term financing for corporations and providing investment opportunities to the public. However, persistent stock fraud cases undermine market integrity…
and investor confidence. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing legal framework for investor protection against stock fraud, analyse its practical implementation, and recommend measures to strengthen both preventive and repressive mechanisms. Employing a normative legal research design with a qualitative approach, the study integrates statute, conceptual, and case approaches, focusing on Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets, OJK regulations, the Criminal Code, and notable cases such as PT Hanson International Tbk. The findings reveal that while the legal framework normatively aligns with the Legal Protection Theory, Justice Theory, and Legal Effectiveness Theory, substantial gaps remain between regulation and enforcement. Weak supervisory coordination, delayed intervention, lengthy judicial processes, and low investor legal literacy reduce effectiveness. Recommended reforms include adopting regtech and suptech, enhancing cross-agency data integration, implementing AI-based surveillance, establishing a specialised capital market court, and strengthening investor education. The study concludes that combining regulatory improvements, adaptive enforcement, and public legal empowerment is essential to safeguard investors, maintain market integrity, and promote sustainable economic growth.
Abstract:This study examines the fulfillment of remission rights for drug offenders in Indonesia following the enactment of Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012, which introduced restrictive provisions inconsistent with the rehabilitative…
ilitative vision of Law No. 12 of 1995. The research problem lies in the normative contradiction between correctional laws oriented toward behavioural reform and derivative regulations that prioritise punitive measures. The study aims to evaluate the implementation of remission regulations and their alignment with principles of justice and human rights. Employing a normative legal research design, it analyses statutes, judicial decisions, doctrines, and comparative law. Findings reveal that remission has shifted from a universal right to a conditional privilege, disproportionately affecting low-level drug offenders, exacerbating prison overcrowding, and weakening legal certainty. The study concludes that policy reform is necessary through individualised assessments, restorative justice integration, independent oversight, and regulatory harmonisation to restore fairness and uphold human rights.
Abstract:This study analyzes the judicial reasoning behind Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo No. 199/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Sda, a landmark decision involving corporate criminal liability for environmental violations in Indonesia. The…
case centers on PT Surya Prima Semesta’s illegal disposal of hazardous waste (fly ash and bottom ash) without an environmental permit, resulting in the prosecution of its corporate director. Employing a normative juridical method, the research examines the court’s application of doctrines such as strict liability and identification theory within the framework of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. The findings show that the court adopted a formalistic, text-based legal reasoning model, treating permit violations as inherently punishable acts regardless of actual environmental harm. While the decision reinforces regulatory compliance and affirms corporate culpability, it lacks engagement with broader organizational responsibility and foundational environmental law principles like the precautionary principle and sustainability. This study argues for a more integrated doctrinal approach one that balances rule-based logic with value-oriented reasoning to enhance legal consistency, advance environmental justice, and align Indonesia’s corporate accountability framework with international standards.
Abstract:Penelitian Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan wawasan terkait adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengenai Peninjauan kembali upaya hukum oleh Badan atau Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang sudah tidak diperbolehkan lagi…
i setelah dikeluarkan putusan tersebut. Meskipun pada Undang-undang sebelumnya pengajuan PK telah menjadi kewenangan PTUN yang tertera dalam UU Peratun No. 5 tahun 1986. Metodologi penulisan yang dipakai berbentuk yuridis normatif. Metode penelitian adalah disiplin ilmu yang mempelajari langkah-langkah dalam proses penelitian, atau ilmu yang terkait dengan metode ilmiah yang digunakan untuk mengambil, membeberkan, dan mengevaluasi keakuratan informasi. Dalam penelitian ini dilakukan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan analitis (analitycal approach). Upaya hukum adalah suatu jalan hukum yang diberikan kepada seseorang atau badan hukum oleh undang-undang, yang merasa belum mendapat keadilan dari putusan hakim di pengadilan. Upaya hukum yang demikian ada dua bentuknya, yaitu upaya hukum biasa terdiri dari dua jenis upaya hukum: Banding, Kasasi. Upaya hukum Luar Biasa: Peninjauan Kembali. Arti demikian ini tentunya tidak terkecuali bagi siapapun dapat mengajukan upaya hukum ke pengadilan, asal sesuai dengan ketentuan dan tidak berlawanan dengan undang-undang yang berlaku. Sama halnya dengan Badan atau Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang berhak mengajukan upaya hukum berdasarkan dengan undang-undang yang menjadi pedomannya dalam beracara
Abstract:This research examines the perspectives and experiences of workers about Human Resource Development (HRD) programs in order to determine the aspects that influence engagement, satisfaction, and overall effectiveness. Employing…
loying a qualitative methodology, the study included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with personnel from several departments. The results indicate that HRD programs are most efficient when they are congruent with individuals' specific career objectives and professional requirements, and when they have sufficient organizational resources and management support. The identification of challenges such as program rigidity and lack of relevance emphasizes the need for HRD methods that are more flexible and responsive. The research highlights the need of customizing HRD programs to cater to the varied requirements of employees and adjusting to rapid changes in the work environment. The findings provide practical and effective guidance for firms to improve their HRD processes and give stronger support for employee development. Further investigation is recommended to examine the incorporation of emerging technologies in HRD and evaluate their influence on employee engagement and development.
Abstract:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pandangan Islam terhadap Gacha dalam permainan mobile legends, dengan mempertimbangkan aspek hukum, etika, dan sosial.metode analisis kualitatif dengan mengumpulkan dan menganalisis…
nalisis pandangan ulama serta literatur Islam terkait dengan perjudian dan praktik serupa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas ulama menganggap Gacha sebagai bentuk perjudian yang bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip Islam. Kesimpulannya,yaitu bahwa dalam pandangan Islam terhadap Gacha mungkin bervariasi, penting bagi pemain Muslim untuk mempertimbangkan dampak moral dan etis dari partisipasi dalam praktik semacam itu, sambil mengacu pada pedoman agama dan nilai-nilai yang dianutnya.
Abstract:Tulisan ini menjelaskan perspektif syariah terhadap pertukaran hadiah dengan undian. Pembahasan ini penting untuk diketahui berhubung banyaknya bersinggungan terhadap fenomena yang terjadi di masyarakat khususnya dalam memeriahkan…
emeriahkan suatu acara. Tulisan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi sumber yang digunakan untuk pertimbangan terhadap pelaksanaan pertukaran hadiah dengan undian. Dalam tulisan ini berisi penjelasan tentang uraian kejadian, status hukum dan dalilnya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan adalah dengan metode penelitian perpustakaan serta pendekatan induktif dan analitis dengan menjelaskan uraian kejadian, kemudian menganalisa, dan setelah itu menyimpulkanya berdasarkan kajian literatur. Tulisan ini meyimpulkan bahwa: Pertama, Pemberian hadiah disertai dengan niat agar ada terjadinya timbal balik suatu saat merupakan suatu kebolehan. Kedua Bertukar hadiah dengan undian diperbolehkan dengan syarat hadiahnya jelas dan sudah ditetapkan harganya. Ketiga, Bertukar hadiah dengan cara mengundi siapa yang mendapat hadiah terbaik dan siapa yang mendapat hadiah terburuk termasuk dalam kategori perjudian apabila disertai dengan adanya kewajiban membayar bagi peserta.
Abstract:Within the context of the Indonesian legal system, this study investigates the crucial function that judicial review plays in ensuring that administrative procedures are lawful and that justice is served. This study sheds…
s light on the techniques, processes, and issues that are involved with judicial review in relation to administrative acts. It does so by conducting a comprehensive analysis of judicial decisions, legal precedents, and legislative frameworks. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of the development of judicial review in Indonesia, following its historical progression and analysing the current state of affairs. Through an in-depth analysis of administrative decisions, it examines the role that the court plays in ensuring that administrative procedures are valid, preserving a system of checks and balances, and protecting fundamental rights. The impact of judicial review on administrative institutions and the legal landscape is also investigated in this study. Particular attention is paid to the role that judicial review plays in promoting openness, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law for administrations. The purpose of this research is to give useful insights into the efficient operation of Indonesia's administrative governance and the improvement of justice in administrative procedures. This is accomplished by casting light on the junction between judicial review and administrative law.